Snima se animirani dokumentarac o Jovanki Orleanki

This docudrama has a number of problems. Its "Joan" character looks nothing like the descriptions given by eyewitnesses (black hair, "beautiful and shapely", etc; whereas the docudrama's version looks like a red-haired boy). The producers have also said (in other interviews) that they think Joan "violated taboos", which is nonsense: she said she DIDN'T fight (as eyewitnesses also agreed), she didn't lead directly, her "male clothing" was just the soldier's riding outfit and armor that she was given to wear by her escort and then by the Royal government (and which she said she continued wearing in prison because the riding outfit could be securely laced together to prevent her English guards from pulling her clothing off). Her role was that of a religious visionary in an era when there were many such people who often gave advice to both secular and religious leaders, hence her role didn't violate any social norms. The producers have also said that they intend to allege that the posthumous appeal of her case - which the docudrama focuses heavily on - was driven by politics just as the trial that convicted her, despite the patent fact that historians have never been able to agree on what the appellate trial's agenda allegedly was, and the judge (Jehan Brehal) had been pro-English during the war. The trial that convicted her was definitely political as proven by English government records and eyewitness accounts, but the appeal was driven mainly by Joan's surviving family members